wcaleb’s avatarwcaleb’s Twitter Archive—№ 9,904

      1. 1. James McBride's novel _The Good Lord Bird_ can be read partly as an allegory about the perils of "big history," especially re: slavery.
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ❤️ 3 Favorites Mood +3 🙂
    1. …in reply to @wcaleb
      2. The novel (hereafter GLB) is a tragicomic take on the oft-told story of John Brown, told by the narrator Henry Shackleford.
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ❤️ 2 Favorites Mood +2 🙂
  1. …in reply to @wcaleb
    3. McBride's John Brown, as in most tellings, has a single-minded focus on the overarching drama of emancipation, in which he stars.
    On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ❤️ 2 Favorites Mood 0
    1. …in reply to @wcaleb
      4. Brown has bird's eye, macro historical view: "I have studied the successful warfare of the Circassian chief Schamyl against the Russians"
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ❤️ 2 Favorites Mood +1 🙂
      1. …in reply to @wcaleb
        5. But the central irony driving the novel is that he fails to see the true identity of Henry, the enslaved individual whom he "knows" best.
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ❤️ 4 Favorites Mood +2 🙂
        1. …in reply to @wcaleb
          6. In the opening scenes of GRB, Brown mistakenly hears Henry's name as "Henrietta" and remains convinced Henry is a girl.
          Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood +1 🙂
          1. …in reply to @wcaleb
            7. This leaves Henry/Henrietta alone to make sense of his/her experience, which Brown never truly sees b/c of focus on slavery writ large.
            Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood -5 🙁
            1. …in reply to @wcaleb
              8. Historians face the same challenge: to see the larger story of slavery w/o looking past/thru the individual Henry/Henrietta before us.
              Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood -4 🙁
              1. …in reply to @wcaleb
                9. This is partly ex. of tension b/w macro, microhistory: what Lepore calls preference for landscape or portrait dissentmagazine.org/blog/booked-2-wonder-woman-history-of-feminism-jill-lepore
                Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood -1 🙁
                1. …in reply to @wcaleb
                  10. But the tension deepened for historians of slavery b/c slavery, white supremacism refuse to see that individual #BlackLivesMatter.
                  Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood -9 🙁
                  1. …in reply to @wcaleb
                    11. As narrator puts it in Good Lord Bird, reflecting on being black in white supremacist society, "Nobody sees the real you."
                    Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood +3 🙂
                    1. …in reply to @wcaleb
                      12. To avoid the well-intentioned Brown's unwitting ignorance of Henry's life in GRB, we have to balance micro- & macro-historical methods.
                      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood -3 🙁
                      1. …in reply to @wcaleb
                        13. That's one reason I enjoyed @arothmanhistory book so much. But even in the best microhistories, the allure of extrapolation remains.
                        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ❤️ 2 Favorites Mood +5 🙂
                        1. …in reply to @wcaleb
                          14. And Good Lord Bird raises the question of what costs in understanding are always incurred by generalizing, as both Brown & Henry do.
                          Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood +3 🙂