wcaleb’s avatarwcaleb’s Twitter Archive—№ 13,841

                1. 1. The Bill O'Reilly comments spotlight (among other things) the pedagogical challenges for teachers of the history of slavery.
              1. …in reply to @wcaleb
                2. Serious historians know that slavery was not monolithic and that living conditions for enslaved people varied across space and time.
            1. …in reply to @wcaleb
              3. But historians also know that modest gains in enslaved people's living conditions, food, housing, were won in struggle, not given freely.
          1. …in reply to @wcaleb
            4. A garden patch, small "wages" for enslaved artisans: owners had to be forced to concede such things by collective struggle by slaves.
        1. …in reply to @wcaleb
          5. As teachers we want students to see this complex reality, to show that people in slavery fought to improve their lot, sometimes won.
      1. …in reply to @wcaleb
        6. Yet the reality is that some students will hear talk of any small improvements in enslaved people's lives the way O'Reilly hears it.
    1. …in reply to @wcaleb
      7. White profs have to be especially careful of wrong impressions: students hear whites undercutting slavery's horror all the time.
  1. …in reply to @wcaleb
    8. Especially easy for a student to hear a white prof's points about enslaved people's small victories & interpolate O'Reilly denialism.
    1. …in reply to @wcaleb
      9. That's one reason I made @Every3Minutes and use it in class in the context of discussing enslaved people's variable situations.
      1. …in reply to @wcaleb
        10. The slave trade highlights the precarity of any improvements in living conditions that slaves managed to wrest from oppressors.
        1. …in reply to @wcaleb
          11. O'Reilly comments only reinforce the need for teachers to stress the "chattel principle," not working conditions, as essence of slavery.
          1. …in reply to @wcaleb
            12. The daily working lives of enslaved people varied; the daily fear and threat of sale away from families and the familiar did not.