wcaleb’s avatarwcaleb’s Twitter Archive—№ 14,033

      1. 1. Good discussion of live-tweeting; ultimately reveals 2 different ways of thinking about what a conference is for @jnthnwwlsn/763677440350662656
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 5 Favorites Mood +3 🙂
    1. …in reply to @wcaleb
      2. Is a conference for professionals to swap “works in progress” among themselves alone? Or to bring scholarship into the public sphere?
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ♻️ 4 Retweets ❤️ 7 Favorites Mood -2 🙁
  1. …in reply to @wcaleb
    3. No question that “live tweeting” is a practice that sees conferences as opportunity to make scholarship more open & public.
    On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 6 Favorites Mood +1 🙂
    1. …in reply to @wcaleb
      4. (And it’s not live tweeting alone that “opens” conferences up: most conferences are already open to the public, though with a fee.)
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ❤️ 3 Favorites Mood -2 🙁
      1. …in reply to @wcaleb
        5. I tweet at conferences as a way to show the public great & relevant work being done by historians & colleagues ...
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 7 Favorites Mood +3 🙂
        1. …in reply to @wcaleb
          6. … and also partly to encourage colleagues to show themselves and their work more often to the public.
          Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 3 Favorites Mood +2 🙂
          1. …in reply to @wcaleb
            7. In that sense, there’s no denying live-tweeting is an attempt to steer professional norms in a particular direction.
            Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 7 Favorites Mood -3 🙁
            1. …in reply to @wcaleb
              8. But staring at papers read aloud is as much a result of a movement to shape scholarly norms as staring at screens #EverythingHasAHistory
              Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ♻️ 3 Retweets ❤️ 9 Favorites Mood 0
              1. …in reply to @wcaleb
                9. Some friction over live-tweeting is inevitable insofar as it represents a debate over what scholars do, where scholarship should be.
                Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 4 Favorites Mood 0
                1. …in reply to @wcaleb
                  10. To say “I’m for more public scholarship” isn’t to deny utility of “works-in-progress” private workshopping among professional circle.
                  Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ❤️ 6 Favorites Mood -2 🙁
                  1. …in reply to @wcaleb
                    11. But there are many spaces for that kind of workshopping in the profession & many norms around them; fewer spaces & norms for public work
                    Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ❤️ 3 Favorites Mood +2 🙂
                    1. …in reply to @wcaleb
                      12. Conferences have always had one foot in public, one in private; live-tweeting is a way to encourage scholars to jump in w/ both feet.
                      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo wcaleb’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 5 Favorites Mood +2 🙂