wcaleb’s avatarwcaleb’s Twitter Archive—№ 14,284

                1. 1. I finally read @NewYorker Underground Railroad piece. A lot to like, but suffers partly from same myopic focus on UGRR that it critiques.
              1. …in reply to @wcaleb
                2. Agree with author that invented UGRR myths are often "feel good" stories that understate slavery's power. E.g. wcm1.web.rice.edu/fake-tubman-quote.html
            1. …in reply to @wcaleb
              3. The other big problem with UGRR stories is that they often focus on white abolitionists, silencing other actors & a much broader story.
          1. …in reply to @wcaleb
            4. But while demystifying "the UGRR" & showing its actual scale, author implies that few other serious challenges to slavery existed in 19c.
        1. …in reply to @wcaleb
          5. And that seems to perpetuate the myopic focus on UGRR, as though if slaves were seldom freed in the specific way imagined in UGRR myth...
      1. …in reply to @wcaleb
        6. ...then they must seldom have been freed at all, & few challenges to slavery must have been mounted by Northerners.
    1. …in reply to @wcaleb
      7. The article thus leaves readers with little idea of how slavery conflict could beget Civil War, per @YAppelbaum @YAppelbaum/765585529807265796
  1. …in reply to @wcaleb
    8. And it also understates the scope & scale of the antislavery movement: the real one, not the one of myth. (See @ProfMSinha's book.)
    1. …in reply to @wcaleb
      9. (P.S. Having now read @colsonwhitehead novel, also not sure "The Underground Railroad," despite title, is primarily concerned with UGRR.)
      1. …in reply to @wcaleb
        10. (The UGRR functions as important device in the novel, to be sure. But fantastically reimagined, in contrast to realism about slavery.)
        1. …in reply to @wcaleb
          11. (That is to say, to see Whitehead's novel as primarily a commentary on UGRR myths is to significantly narrow its scope and power.)
          1. …in reply to @wcaleb
            12. (But that could just be my idiosyncratic reading of the novel. /End parenthetical tweet storm within the tweet storm.)