-
@kennethosgood1 I agree that history in general—political history included!—needs to be valued. No quarrels with last two paragraphs! +Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
@kennethosgood1 But impression I get is that lack of public lobbying for traditional political history is not the main problem. +Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -6 🙁
-
@kennethosgood1 On contrary, it’s the kind of history many legislators, lobbyists want more of, seeing social hist. as “liberal” academy +Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +1 🙂
-
@kennethosgood1 So there's a legit concern that when we ourselves frame divides b/w social & political, we fuel the fire that burns us all +Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -2 🙁
-
@kennethosgood1 You were careful, to be clear (“long overdue diversification” etc), but as on Twitter, nuance hard & NYT a big bullhorn +Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +3 🙂
-
@kennethosgood1 I think you’re right that a lot of it depends on where one sits. Seeing colleagues here in Texas fight battles for history +Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -2 🙁
-
@kennethosgood1 in terms of public funding & diverse curricula, textbooks, against groups that want ONLY traditional PH, shapes my reax -Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +1 🙂
-
@kennethosgood1 That said, I can see how I might have different reax were I self-identified primarily as a political historian +Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood 0
-
@kennethosgood1 For others I follow here like @rachelshelden , your points about PH being devalued resonated, though still w/ disagreement +Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood 0
-
@kennethosgood1 @rachelshelden And I appreciate your engagement and discussion; hope you’ll stick around on Twitter! -On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +4 🙂