-
1. I think there are too many "straw men" in this debates. A defender of sensitivity is not automatically a censor. @chronicle/643834576222027776
-
2. Another straw man is the idea of a university that summarily acts on every complaint it receives in a way that satisfies complainant.
-
3. And can a university's commitment to free speech be reasonably judged by whom it invites for one (very unique kind of) speech every year?
-
4. There's also frequent slippage between two very different things, as seen in second para. of @POTUS remarks.
-
5. Principled opposition to "demeaning signals" not the same as categorical opposition to encountering of "different perspectives."
-
6. Those, at least, are some initial thoughts about issues I've been pondering a lot.